Twilight of the Gods Review Essay Example

Twilight of the Gods Review Paper Essay on Twilight of the Gods Science has strict criteria for its subject one or Noah forms of truth in her particular field scientific criteria. First of all, 1) you can not believe in anything in the framework of science: science is called upon to doubt everything, so theres no room for belief hence it is not fundamentally sovmetsima with religion and theology itself. 2) theoretically, ALL, without exception, scientific theories, as part of any science including humanities can double-check this is what is called a verification. Thats what science finds here its important quality it is objective, that is, its results do not depend on the arbitrariness of a particular subject. 3) finding the scientific worldview, ways of thinking man finds freedom the ability to act in accordance with the need to their advantage. Moreover, science is not just a method, a system, a set of methods and procedures, that is, it comprehensively examines the totality of reality, and is not limited to its description, but also ident ifies and analyzes patterns not only the phenomenon, but also the processes. 4) now the science has moved from descriptive (descriptive) on Essential a theoretical level of development (which is not understood, by the way, has always denied the said phenomenalist Popper and therefore hopelessly behind). Continuity: Einstein overturned mechanists (Newton) and expanded and supplemented. And if, say, Laplace did not need the hypothesis of God in the 19th century, neither now, nor at any time in the future it will not need physics it can be guaranteed. 5) No, it can not be the criterion of truth is the only practice. Its just that ever learn prayer boil the kettle only then will be subject to refutation of this criterion. No other system other than science, which can be used to describe and study intentionally TRANSFORM is really no! Twilight of the Gods Review Essay Example Twilight of the Gods Review Paper Essay on Twilight of the Gods Thats right, in addition to the output: not God, but the illusion is always a powerful stimulus to the activity of not only individuals, but even large social groups. Well-known figures of the revolutionary epoch disappointment in the results of their achievements. This is what Engels wrote about this: Suppose these people imagine that they can seize power well, so what? The way only they pierce a hole that would destroy the dam, the flow itself quickly put an end to their illusions. But if it so happened that these illusions would have given them a great strength of will, whether it is necessary to complain about? People boast that made the revolution, always be sure the next day, they did not know what they were doing, that the revolution made quite unlike the one that they wanted to do. This is what Hegel called the irony of history, that irony which escaped a few historical figures. So that the social illusion oddly enough, but this is precisely what has raised so far in the a ccomplishment and the intelligentsia, and the people in the struggle for change in their living conditions. Exactly the same arguments that you are above results and Marx in Capital is an example of how illusory it becomes an objective force, which really embodied the ghost of his calling, but the cause remains outside the analysis of the illusion, and it is something and have a valid object analysis rather than the aspiration flow unconscious in which it is embodied. While youre good at reasoning typically domarksistkom level, so Marxism (but only in the present, and even more so in todays not to be confused with any there ziganoobraznoy gruel or where the official doctrine kapeeses) is waiting for you a lot of surprise. Twilight of the Gods Review Essay Example Twilight of the Gods Review Paper Essay on Twilight of the Gods Allow myself, even after almost six months after the last commentary, add my point of view To touch my point is not the book itself, which will come on when a student years reading and discussion topics -. The truth and necessity of science and religion Personally, for myself I see such a picture: a science it is a samorazrastayuschiysya crystal in which each successive layer lattice reliable, logical, uniquely tied to the previous one. And this crystal grows more and more rapidly, yet its speed is finite The space that fills the crystal steps, and even in the long term, we understand that, on the basis of the method of growth of infinity are not talking. As part of our consciousness as science can not afford to go beyond this crystal. Beyond the knowable. And no matter how great he may be, he still remains a cage for our consciousness. We will write a custom essay sample on Twilight of the Gods Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Twilight of the Gods Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Twilight of the Gods Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer But religion does not bother with strict logical connections between a captured spaces faith. Religion claims immediately to the whole infinite conceivable spaces of reality, claiming both the known and above all on the unknowable. And this gives the human consciousness the possibility of separation from all the boundaries. I think that in due time the wisdom of the fathers (or rather lack of it) did not save religion from the attacks on the area of ​​the known (apparently underestimated the capabilities of human intelligence). It seems to me the only applicable to religion remains unknowable space which can only be in infinity because any final level of knowledge of ability to achieve Same way, it is logical that God is forced beyond any finite value And the church must now ask for forgiveness not only for Giordano Bruno and Galileo, but in general permanently leave the area all potentially achievable science. The only question is how far should we push God to a wordly level. And if he has this level, whether it? Personally, my view Requires still leave a place for him Twilight of the Gods Review Essay Example Twilight of the Gods Review Paper Essay on Twilight of the Gods Allow myself, even after almost six months after the last commentary, add my point of view To touch my point is not the book itself, which will come on when a student years reading and discussion topics -. The truth and necessity of science and religion Personally, for myself I see such a picture: a science it is a samorazrastayuschiysya crystal in which each successive layer lattice reliable, logical, uniquely tied to the previous one. And this crystal grows more and more rapidly, yet its speed is finite The space that fills the crystal steps, and even in the long term, we understand that, on the basis of the method of growth of infinity are not talking. As part of our consciousness as science can not afford to go beyond this crystal. Beyond the knowable. And no matter how great he may be, he still remains a cage for our consciousness. We will write a custom essay sample on Twilight of the Gods Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Twilight of the Gods Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Twilight of the Gods Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer But religion does not bother with strict logical connections between a captured spaces faith. Religion claims immediately to the whole infinite conceivable spaces of reality, claiming both the known and above all on the unknowable. And this gives the human consciousness the possibility of separation from all the boundaries. I think that in due time the wisdom of the fathers (or rather lack of it) did not save religion from the attacks on the area of ​​the known (apparently underestimated the capabilities of human intelligence). It seems to me the only applicable to religion remains unknowable space which can only be in infinity because any final level of knowledge of ability to achieve Same way, it is logical that God is forced beyond any finite value And the church must now ask for forgiveness not only for Giordano Bruno and Galileo, but in general permanently leave the area all potentially achievable science. The only question is how far should we push God to a wordly level. And if he has this level, whether it? Personally, my view Requires still leave a place for him